Philosophical Foundations of Scientific Realism and Anti-Realism

This exam focuses on the philosophical foundations of scientific realism and anti-realism, assessing key arguments presented by philosophers such as David Hume and Bas van Fraassen. Candidates will explore the implications of these positions for understanding scientific practice and epistemology.

Engagement with these foundational concepts is vital for comprehending the debates surrounding the nature of truth in science and the implications for scientific theories' status. The discourse informs broader philosophical implications about knowledge, belief, and the relation between theory and evidence.

Students will be assessed on their ability to verbally articulate differing philosophical positions on realism and anti-realism, analyze significant arguments, and discuss their implications concerning scientific hypotheses. Candidates should demonstrate familiarity with contemporary developments in these debates.

This examination emphasizes candidates' skills in philosophical reasoning, requiring them to clearly communicate complex ideas and engage critically with relevant literature.